Operating note

Second review before filing

By ExtraordinaryOS / Jack Smith, company operator. 26 August 2026. Educational only. Not legal advice.

The first pass is the draft the associate or partner already wrote. The second pass is a structured look at that draft before filing.

USCIS may deny for missing required initial evidence without an RFE or a NOID. That is the 5 August 2026 policy update. The second review is a completeness pass while the packet is still in the office. It is not a prediction of what the officer will do.

The kit inventories the record, checks claims against the classification sources (EB-1A / EB-2 NIW / O-1A), lists gaps and weak points, and writes a memo for counsel. The lawyer keeps every legal judgment. Confirm the live source before you file. INA, CFR, and the Policy Manual chapter for the classification you are actually filing, as those sources stand on filing day.

Run it locally. Files stay on firm systems. ExtraordinaryOS does not receive the petition or the evidence.

First pass, then second

The first pass is the argument. Cover letter, exhibit list, letters, criterion or prong write-ups. Someone at the firm already did that work.

The second pass is inventory, a claim-to-exhibit map, a gap list, and a hostile read. Then a memo in five sections only: Facts; Evidence; Issues; Suggested questions; Counsel legal decisions. Choose the kit that matches the classification on the draft. Confirm the live source before you file. See what a second review is and pick the right kit.

5-star verified review

★★★★★

“Once built into our systems, we found these tools to be very insightful. They give a tremendous second review of the petition and give actionable points to help improve the petitions prior to filing. Very cool resource.”
Andrew Solis, Verified Buyer

A model will often agree with whatever you feed it. That is why the memo keeps Facts, Evidence, and Issues apart from Counsel legal decisions. The last section is the lawyer’s. The kit does not fill it.

Work the draft criterion by criterion, or prong by prong. Map each claim to an exhibit. If the exhibit does not say it, the review must not say it. List the holes. Do not ask the model for odds. Do not let it inflate the language past the record. See what to use AI for, and what not to.

Instant start. Buy it, use it, email [email protected] if you need a hand. We help you get successful with the workflow. Do not send client files.

$199 special offer. One-time. Connects to the workflow the firm already uses. Choose a kit.

This page is educational only. It is not legal advice.