For U.S. immigration lawyers and law firms. Not for petitioners.

O-1A Petition Second Review Kit

A local second review of an O-1A Form I-129 draft (sciences, education, business, or athletics) the firm already wrote. Files stay at the firm. Nothing is uploaded. Counsel keeps every legal judgment.

What it is
A structured second look that writes a five-head memo for counsel: Facts; Evidence; Issues; Suggested questions; Counsel legal decisions.
The standard
8 CFR 214.2(o) and USCIS Policy Manual Volume 2, Part M, Chapter 4. Evidentiary criteria are the mechanism, not the classification standard.
Price
$199 one-time. No subscription.

Unzip the kit on a firm machine. Point Cursor, ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini at the folder.

Nothing is uploaded. ExtraordinaryOS does not receive the petition or the evidence.

Counsel memo, five heads: Facts, Evidence, Issues, Suggested questions, Counsel legal decisions

★★★★★

“Once built into our systems, we found these tools to be very insightful. They give a tremendous second review of the petition and give actionable points to help improve the petitions prior to filing. Very cool resource.”
Andrew Solis, Verified Buyer

What this kit is

A local second review of an O-1A I-129 draft. Files stay at the firm. Counsel keeps every legal judgment.

  • Map the record to the O-1A standard in USCIS Policy Manual Volume 2, Part M, Chapter 4.
  • Keep consultation, contract, and itinerary issues visible.
  • Separate facts from counsel’s legal decisions.

What this kit is not

  • An O-1B (Arts) or O-1B (MPTV) kit
  • An EB-1A immigrant kit (different statute, ten criteria, no consultation, self-petition allowed, “substantially benefit prospectively” element)
  • An EB-2 NIW kit
  • Legal advice, a filing portal, or a beneficiary self-petition product

What is in the kit

Run these files on the draft you already wrote.

OrderFilePurpose
0privacy.mdConfirm local-only handling
1START-HERE.mdAudience, scope, and suggested order of work
2sources.mdConfirm the live statute, regulation, and Policy Manual before filing
3workflow.mdRun the review sequence
4criteria-or-prongs.mdO-1A eight criteria, comparable evidence, area of ability, petition extras
5evidence-gap-audit.mdExhibit-by-exhibit gaps
6source-to-claim.mdEvery petition sentence needs a source
7rfe-risk-review.mdIssues only; no outcome prediction
8final-merits-or-totality.mdTotality worksheet
9pre-filing-qa.mdCounsel/staff QA before file
10voice-system.mdOptional language pass after facts are grounded
11results-template.mdMemo sections: Facts; Evidence; Issues; Suggested questions; Counsel legal decisions
examples.mdFictional/sanitized illustrations only. Do not copy into a live petition.

The standard this kit reviews against

O-1A beneficiary must (PM Ch. 4 § C): have extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics, demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim; have achievements recognized in the field through extensive documentation; and be coming to continue work in the area of extraordinary ability (the particular U.S. duties need not require someone of such extraordinary ability).

Supporting documentation: a major internationally recognized award (example given: Nobel Prize) or at least three of eight evidentiary criteria, or comparable evidence where a listed criterion does not readily apply. Satisfying three criteria is not the classification standard. Officers then evaluate totality.

Petitioner: U.S. employer, U.S. agent, or foreign employer through a U.S. agent. PA-2025-02: a separate legal entity owned by the beneficiary (corporation or LLC) may file on the beneficiary’s behalf. The beneficiary may not petition for himself or herself.

Confirm 8 CFR 214.2(o) and the live Policy Manual before filing.

Reviewer posture

  • Local only. Do not upload the I-129, itinerary, consultation, contract, exhibits, or client identity.
  • Evidentiary criteria are the mechanism, not the standard (PM Ch. 4).
  • If the draft uses “distinction,” arts/MPTV criteria, ten EB-1A criteria, or Dhanasar prongs, flag the mix. Do not import those standards.
  • Prior or future EB-1A is a separate petition.
  • Stop if the reviewer is asked for approval odds.

FAQ

The bound that matters before you buy.

Who may use this kit after purchase?

A purchase authorizes one individual. If someone else at the firm needs to run it too, have them buy their own kit. That is how this stays funded. We do not lock the zip. More FAQ.

Do files leave the firm?

No. The kit is a local workflow. ExtraordinaryOS does not receive the petition or the evidence. Counsel keeps every legal judgment.

Privacy

Your client material stays with your firm. ExtraordinaryOS sells the local workflow and templates. We do not receive the petition or the evidence, and counsel retains every legal decision.

Get the O-1A kit

$199 special offer. One-time. No subscription. Connects to the workflow you already use.